These boats are sometimes referred to as the Porpoise class from the single prototype, HMS Porpoise built in 1932
The history of Royal Navy minelayers began when six of the E Class submarines ordered in 1914 were built to carry 20 mines in mine tubes in the saddle tanks. E24, the first Royal Navy minelayer, was completed on 9th January 1916 and later that year it was ordered that six submarines of the L Class be fitted with mine tubes in the external tanks. In July 1920, the Naval Staff investigated the need and requirements for submarine minelayers - the main bone of contention being whether the mines should be carried internally or externally. As an experiment, M3 was converted in 1927 to carry mines externally.
The satisfactory performance of M3 led to the design of a new submarine minelayer. Specifically designed for the task of minelaying, six of the class were ordered in the 1930 Programme - the first-of-class Porpoise, Narwhal and Rorqual from Vickers, Grampus and Seal from Chatham and Cachalot from Scotts. Slightly slimmer than the Overseas Patrol Submarine, but with greater displacement, the new class had a capacity to carry 50 standard Mk XVI mines in a full-length deck outside the pressure hull.
During the trials of M3 it was found that whilst the minelaying gear and compensating arrangements to maintain trim were satisfactory, the jigger-type mine-launching equipment required excessive upkeep to ensure its efficiency. Therefore, this equipment was changed in the Grampus Class to a chain and rack system fitted outside the hull in the superstructure casing. The mines and minelaying gear weighed approximately 54 tons. The conversion of M3 also had an adverse affect on its diving qualities - the time taken to flood the mine casing meant that it took about 5 minutes to dive in calm weather and 13 minutes or more in rough weather. Only by careful design arrangements was this reduced in Porpoise - she could dive, with mines on board, to periscope depth from full buoyancy in 1 minute 32 seconds and, using 0 tank, in 1 minute 14 seconds.
The hull form of Porpoise was very similar to that of the Overseas Patrol Submarine, Parthian, but the effect of carrying 50 mines meant that the stern torpedo tubes were deleted and the main engine horsepower was reduced by 25 per cent - resulting in a loss in surface speed. The design diving depth was also reduced, to 300 feet.
Although the external tanks were of 'non-leaking' welded construction, as in the Thames, it was thought that if exposed to depth charge attacks leaks would occur and give away the submarine's position. Therefore, the hull form for the Chatham built Grampus was radically changed (saddle tanks were extended, the pressure hull was altered, etc.) so that oil fuel, which was carried externally in Porpoise, could be carried in internal tanks. This change also increased the main ballast water carried by Grampus by about 100 tons, and at the same time improved the stability and reserve buoyancy of the boat.
All vessels of the class had balloon tanks, i.e. pressure-tight tanks, in the forward superstructure to balance the buoyancy of the mines aft and prevent the submarine diving stern first.
Built between 1930 and 1938, the six boats of the class were fitted with two Admiralty-designed vertical four-stroke blast-injection six-cylinder diesels that together generated 3300 bhp, giving a surface speed, in service, of 16 knots. Tandem sets of motors on each shaft developed a total of 1630 bhp, giving a submerged service speed of 8.9 knots. Carrying 336 cells in three battery tanks weighing a total of 139 tons, the class had a submerged endurance of 66 miles at 4 knots.
In addition to the 50 mines, the armament of the class consisted of six 21-inch bow torpedo tubes (with 12 torpedoes carried) and a 4-inch gun (a 4.7-inch gun was originally fitted in Porpoise) with 120 rounds of ammunition - this being chosen as the standard gun to be fitted in Royal Navy submarines. When the gun of Porpoise was changed to the standard calibre a weight saving of about seven tons was achieved.
When the Royal Navy produced a mine which could be laid from a 21-inch torpedo tube, the need for specialised submarine minelayers disappeared. Surprisingly, the introduction of this newly-designed mine did not lead to the redundancy of existing minelayers, and these purpose-built vessels proved extremely successful in the Second World War when used as supply submarines, running precious cargoes to Malta in 1941 and 1942. Their spacious mine-decks were filled with such diverse items as machine-gun ammunition, glycol coolant for Spitfires, and food.
Five of the six submarine minelayers were lost during the war, and the history of the class produces an unhappy diary of events:
The era of the large minelaying submarine came to an end when the only surviving member of the class, the Barrow-built Rorqual, was taken out of service in April 1946.
| Class: | 1930 - 1946: Grampus Class |
| Built By: | Scotts (Clyde) |
| Build Group: | G2 |
| Fate: | |
| 30 July 1941 - Scuttled off Benghazi to avoid capture | |
11 pages added or updated in the last Array month
Please help to maintain this site by reporting any Errors, Broken Links, Information or Site Issues on this page using this button
If you find this site useful, please consider supporting my work with a small Donation. Or you can make a big one if you like :)
Please Note: Donations made using this option go directly to the site owner and not to the Submariners Association.
Thankyou for your support.
| Class: | 1930 - 1946: Grampus Class |
| Built By: | Scotts (Clyde) |
| Build Group: | G2 |
| Fate: | |
| 30 July 1941 - Scuttled off Benghazi to avoid capture | |
11 pages added or updated in the last Array month
Please help to maintain this site by reporting any Errors, Broken Links, Information or Site Issues on this page using this button
If you find this site useful, please consider supporting my work with a small Donation. Or you can make a big one if you like :)
Please Note: Donations made using this option go directly to the site owner and not to the Submariners Association.
Thankyou for your support.
This form is for you to comment on, or add additional information to this page. Any questions will be deleted. If you wish to ask a question contact the Branch or the Webmaster using the Contact Us page or ask your question on our Facebook Page